« Too Many Brain Imaging Systems? |
Main
| Neuromarketing Our Next President »
April 18, 2004
Neurotechnology - Faster, Safer, Smarter
Posted by Zack Lynch
Neurotechnology represents better tools for mental health. As I mentioned in my letter to President Bush last year, neurotechnology will emerge before genetic engineering as the primary toolset that humanity will use to counter the growing global mental health epidemic for many reasons, including:
Neurotechnology effect is temporary, genetic engineering is permanent: Human genetic engineering won't become widely adopted until people can experiment with less permanent tools, especially when it comes to issues of human behavior
Social acceptance is proven: Humans are already using first generation neurotechnologies on a vast scale. For example, 17% of the US white-collar work force is currently using anti-depressants
Regulation and distribution systems are in place: The FDA and pharmaceutical development and distribution systems are already globally trusted processes, while genetic engineering will requires entirely new regulatory and distribution institutions
Scientific complexity: Genetic engineering requires knowing all the potential downstream consequences that altering a specific gene will have throughout one's life. The convergence of biochips and brain imaging will allow us iincrementally improve our understanding of our brain, making it possible for individuals to temporarily test and shape those mental attributes that help them achieve the goals important to them at that period of their life, much sooner.
Indeed, as neurotechnology develops it may turn out that in a majority of situations humans will choose neurotechnology instead of genetic engineering to combat disease because each versatility it offers.
It appears that some were listening to this line of reasoning. The recent shift in the President's Council on Bioethics towards neuroethics is proof that people are beginning to see that neurotechnology is becoming to be seen as the real driver of near term economic, social and political change, rather than genetic engineering.
But the genetic engineering meme remains deeply embedded across society. Just yesterday, the otherwise insightful economist, Tyler Cowen, suggested that parents will likely choose to genetically engineer their children to be more "obedient". Really? Would you really choose to permanently shape the personality of your future children if tools were available to allow them to make their own choices when they deemed it appropriate?
Indeed, it has only been in the past few months that have we have seen the most effective medium of mass education, movies, begin to address the impact that neurotechnology will have across society. While the highly specific memory erasure neurotechnologies that are portrayed in movies like Eternal Sunshine in the Spotless Mind, PayCheck and the soon to be release Robin William's film, The Final Cut, remain unproven, last month's NYTimes magazine piece on measure erasure technologies shows the field in moving faster than many would think.
To accelerate the public understanding of neurotechnology and galvanize the financial markets focus on this area, I have recently joined forces with Kevin Jones to accelerate the neurotechnology meme into the global consciousness. I am honored have Kevin joining with me on this important mission of accelerating the development of better tools for mental health for all. Stay Tuned.
Comments (0)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Neurotech Industry
- RELATED ENTRIES
- Neurotech 2010: Translational Researchers Highlight Innovation
- The Neuro Revolution in China Progressing
- Speakers for Neurotech 2010 - Boston, May 19-20
- Giving the Brain a Voice: NIO Public Policy Tour in DC tomorrow
- McGovern Institue for Brain Research at MIT Goes Web 2.0
- The Neurodiagnostics Report 2010: Brain Imaging, Biomarkers and NeuroInformatics
- Neuropharma FDA Approvals Down in 2009
- Tel Aviv Neurotech Cluster Thrives